Employees News
10:15
Showing posts with label Employees News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Employees News. Show all posts
Friday, 24 February 2017
Saturday, 31 December 2016
Reserve Bank of India
18:47
RBI allows bulk issue of prepaid cards
RBI allows bulk issue of prepaid cards
Mumbai: Banks and other issuers of prepaid instruments have been allowed to issue such cards in bulk to corporates and other employers to replace cash salaries with electronic payments. Prepaid cards are aimed at helping those employers who have a large number of workers without bank accounts. They can be used just like plastic cards.
The RBI has said that the relaxation has been provided to "facilitate greater adoption of digital payments". Until now, such bulk cards could be issued to only listed corporates. Under the relaxed norms, the central bank has allowed unlisted corporates, partnership firms, sole proprietorship, public organisations like municipal corporations, and urban local bodies to buy these cards in bulk for onward issue to their staff.
"Banks shall extend this facility only to those employers that have a bank account with them and after obtaining an undertaking that they are not availing of this facility from any other bank," the RBI said in a circular on Tuesday.
While the bank will issue blank cards, verification of the identity of the staff/employees or contract workers will be the responsibility of the 'employer', the RBI said. "The bank should put in place proper systems to capture and maintain details of the employees to whom the cards are issued by the 'employer' along with copies of photograph and identity proof of such employees," said the RBI.
Source:IBEF
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
postal Department
16:09
National Union Of Postal Employees Federation forwarded the letter received from NUPE IV to The CPMG, Tamilnadu Circle for necessary action.
National Union Of Postal Employees Federation forwarded the letter received from NUPE IV to The CPMG, Tamilnadu Circle for necessary action.
Source:FNPO
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
SBI Employees
08:09
Spouse of bank employee entitled to transfer benefits: HC
Spouse of bank employee entitled to transfer benefits: HC
AHMEDABAD: Gujarat high court has held that a government employee, who is spouse of a nationalized bank employee, is entitled to the inter-district transfer to the place his/her spouse is posted.
Justice S G Shah ordered the state government to transfer a vidhya sahayak from Banaskantha district to Surendranagar district, where her husband is employed with the State Bank of India (SBI).
According to case details, Shobhanaben Kanaiyalal Nayee works in a remote village of Gagana as vidhya sahayak in a primary school. She has a two-year-old child and has been facing difficulties in finding support because her husband works at an SBI branch in Vadhwan in Surendranagar.
The schools teacher repeatedly requested the education department to transfer her to Surendranagar. But the authorities rejected her request on the ground that a February 2014 government resolution, which governs inter-district transfer of a government employee to the place where his/her spouse works, does not mention bank.
The teacher finally approached the high court, where her counsel submitted that by all means SBI can be treated as a board or corporation of the Union government. The village is in dry region on the border of Rajasthan and at given point of time, the teacher has to travel 300km for Surendranagar. After hearing the case, Justice Shah said that SBI is a banking corporation though it is known as bank. Therefore, the teacher is entitled to the February 2014 GR of transfer of policy.
Source:TOI
Friday, 9 September 2016
Revise rate
07:49
Strike call given by AIBOC on 2nd September, 2016 deferred following negotiations with RLC(C) and IBA.
Strike call given by AIBOC on 2nd September, 2016 deferred following negotiations with RLC(C) and IBA.

Source:AIBPRC
Wednesday, 27 April 2016
National Pension System
21:52
Changes in NPS
Changes in NPS
The Government has proposed the following in the Finance Bill, 2016 with regard to the National Pension System (NPS):
i. Allowing 40 per cent of the NPS corpus tax exempt on lump sum withdrawal.
ii. Waiving service tax on the NPS corpus utilized for purchase of annuity.
iii. The amount receivable by the nominee in case of death of the subscriber covered under NPS has been made tax exempt.
iv. One-time portability without any tax implication has been allowed to the subscriber for shifting from recognized provident fund to NPS.
v. One-time portability without any tax implication has been allowed to the subscriber for shifting from superannuation fund to NPS.
As per the provisions of the Finance Bill, 2016, 40 per cent of the pension corpus under NPS is proposed to be tax exempt on lump sum withdrawal. Also, the proposal in the Union Budget, 2016-17 for taxation of 60 per cent of provident fund corpus under the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been withdrawn by the Government. Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) remains an Exempt Scheme.
However, EPF and NPS are different schemes available to separate categories of subscribers and they are not comparable on one-to-one basis.
This information given by Shri Bandaru Dattatreya, Minister of State (IC) for Labour and Employment, in reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.
Source:PIBNEWS
Saturday, 2 April 2016
privatise IDBI Bank
20:44
IDBI Bank claims strike failed, unions say near success
IDBI Bank claims strike failed, unions say near success
Even as unions of state-run IDBI Bank on Monday claimed a successful one-day strike, the management said the bank “functioned normally”.
The strike, which was called by the United Platform of IDBI Bank Unions (UPIBU), which constitutes officers from the All India IDBI Officers’ Association (AIIDBIOA) and IDBI Employees’ Association (IDBIEA), is one of the many hurdles to the government’s privatization drive and attempts to consolidate other public sector bank (PSBs).
The bank claimed that none of its services were disrupted following the nation-wide strike, except in Karnataka, where the high court has asked the unions not to go on strike.
“All banking services like front-office services, back-office operations including cheque clearing, remittances, RTGS/NEFT, transaction banking services, treasury operations have been functioning normally,” IDBI Bank said in a statement.
But the unions gave a different picture. “The strike was a grand success. All the offices and branches of the bank remained closed today,” UFIOE, which called for a one-day strike, said in a statement.
Employees and officers affiliated to UPIBU have called for a four-day strike. “Today, almost 85% of the officers and 100% of employees were on strike. Our strike will continue for three more days,” a member of UPIBU said.
“Our agitation programme, which includes the four-day strike, is against the contemplated move of the government to reduce its stake in IDBI Bank below 50%,” said UPIBU in a statement, demanding that suspension orders issued against certain officers regarding their agitation last week be revoked.
The protest follows two failed reconciliatory meetings with the labour commissioner on 18 March and 21 March between IDBI Bank employees and the management.
Separately, the All India Bank Officers’ Association (AIBOA) had also issued a one-day strike call on Monday to lend support to IDBI Bank union.
Finance minister Arun Jaitley, in his budget speech last month, said that the government will consider ceding control of IDBI Bank, slashing its stake to less than 50% from 80.2% now.
The privatization drive is part of the larger plan to infuse Rs.19,000-20,000 crore of equity into the bank before 31 March 2019 under the Basel-III norms.
Other options include sale of non-core assets and raising fresh money through a private placement to institutional placement which IDBI Bank announced in December 2015.
On 21 March, Mint reported that the International Finance Corp., a private investment arm of the World Bank, was one of the investors interested in buying a stake in IDBI Bank and had finished inspection of the bank’s balance sheet and other financial information.
The UK’s CDC Group Plc. and US private equity firm TPG Capital were also in talks with the government to buy a stake, said the report. Both IFC and CDC Group officials were in Mumbai two weeks ago to meet top IDBI Bank executives.
Names of other interested parties such as the Government of Singapore Investment Corp. (GIC), a sovereign wealth fund, and private equity firm Temasek Holdings Pvt. Ltd have also emerged.
On 1 March, the bank announced a three-year turnaround plan in which the lender aims to double its total business to over Rs.10 trillion by March 2019 from the current level of about Rs.5 trillion.
The government’s proposal to trim its stake in IDBI Bank to under 50% will be a test case for whether the government can pursue the politically difficult plan to privatize state-run lenders. According to a Moody’s report, Indian banks will need an estimated Rs.1.45 trillion of equity fund infusion by March 2019 to recapitalize weak banks.
At 9:20am, IDBI Bank shares were quoting at Rs.70.50 apiece on the BSE. The stock was down 0.42% from Wednesday’s close. Indian markets were closed on Thursday and Friday on public holidays.
At current rates, the value of the government’s stake is Rs.10,737 crore. The stock has touched a high of Rs.95.70 and a low of Rs.47.40 in the past 52 weeks.
The government infusion into state-owned banks is part of the Basel-III norms to improve the banking sector’s ability to deal with financial and economic stress. The norms require banks to maintain a minimum capital adequacy of 9% and a Tier-I capital ratio of 7%. Indian banks need an estimated Rs.3.7 trillion by the year ended 31 March 2019 to meet the requirements.
Source:BankingUpdates
Source:BankingUpdates
Saturday, 26 March 2016
trade unions
18:21
EPFO earns negative return on investment in stocks
EPFO earns negative return on investment in stocks
The Finance Ministry has allowed private provident funds to invest a minimum of 5 per cent and a maximum of 15 per cent in equity and equity related schemes.
Retirement fund body EPFO has earned a negative return of 9.54 per cent on its Rs 5,920 crore investment in exchange traded funds (ETFs) since August last year, prompting labour unions to demand rollback of the decision to park funds in stock markets.
The market value of investments of Rs 5,920 crore (Rs 59.20 billion) in the ETFs in the current fiscal was Rs 5,355 crore (Rs 53.55 billion) on February 29, 2016, as per an analysis of equity investment by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).
The analysis of EPFO investments in equity market will be placed before apex decision making body Central Board of Trustees, headed by the Labour Minister, in its meeting on March 17.
The EPFO started investing in ETFs in August last year after the CBT in March cleared proposal to invest in equity markets.
The board specified that it will invest 5 per cent of incremental deposits in the current fiscal.
However, the Finance Ministry has allowed private provident funds to invest a minimum of 5 per cent and a maximum of 15 per cent in equity and equity related schemes.
Trade unions have been opposing the decision to invest in equities or equity-linked schemes in view of market volatility.
"We have been opposing investments in the stock market. We will also raise this issue in the next meeting of CBT on March 17. We are custodian of poor workers money and safety of their provident fund is our concern," Hind Mazdoor Sabha Secretary and and EPFO trustee A D Nagpal said.
D L Sachdev, All India Trade Union Congress Secretary and an EPFO trustee, said, "The decision to invest in equity market was wrong. We will demand for rolling back of this decision in next meeting of CBT. We cannot continue with such loss-making investment."
EPFO is expected to receive an incremental deposit of Rs 1.15 lakh crore in the current fiscal.
It manages a corpus of over Rs 8.5 lakh crore with subscribers' base of over five crore across the country.
Source:Rediff
Friday, 25 March 2016
privatise IDBI Bank
22:01
IDBI BANK STRIKE:UNIONS AWAIT FOR CLARITY
IDBI BANK STRIKE:UNIONS AWAIT FOR CLARITY
Unions await clarity on strike call in IDBI Bank
Two courts have issued orders restraining the unions from going on a four-day strike starting March 28
The unions which were planning a day's strike in IDBI Bank in protest against the Centre's plan to reduce its shareholding in the lender, are waiting for clarity on whether orders issued by two courts in two states would go against their strike.
According to AIBEA's general secretary C H Venkatachalam, a court in Karnataka and another in Telangana have issued orders restraining the unions from conducting strikes from March 28 to March 31. The order was issued based on a petition filed by IDBI Bank, and was related to a four-day strike call by a section of bank officers.
Both AIBEA and All India Bank Officer's Association (AIBOA) had given a one-day strike call on March 28. However, a section of officers went ahead and announced a four-day strike from March 28 to 31. This, according to sources, could create difficulties, considering that the bank would be non-functional for nine days at a stretch starting Friday, March 25 , and that too just before the start of the new financial year.
"There is also a confusion prevailing in terms of the strike. It is only in IDBI Bank that the strike is going to happen and not in other banks," said Venkatachalam.
Various unions were mentioned by IDBI Bank in its petition and it has to be clarified whether the order is binding on all unions and whether or not the unions can go ahead with the one-day strike announced, he added.
The one-day strike has been announced by the employees' union against the central government's proposed move to reduce the equity stake in IDBI Bank to less than 50 per cent.
SOURCE:BUSINESS STANDARD
Tuesday, 15 March 2016
Employees News
07:52
No bank merger before 2017-18
No bank merger before 2017-18
The roadmap to the proposed consolidation of public sector banks is expected to be rolled out by the year-end but the process may take more time to kick off. No mergers will fructify before 2017-18, sources said.
“The exercise has to be very planned and thought out, since this would mean crores of customers and over eight lakh employees…so it needs research and delicate handling if the number has to be brought down to less than 10, it will take some time,” a government official on condition of anonymity told Hindustan Times.
The official also said that the process will be undertaken only after consultation with the unions and other stakeholders.
Finance minister Arun Jaitley announced on March 5 that consolidation was the way forward for state owned banks, which will have to deal with intense competition. While a committee will be set up to look into the issue, the Banks Board Bureau (BBB) to be headed by former Comptroller and Auditor General of India Vinod Rai, too will deal with this.
Sources said that the government may also look at setting up an asset reconstruction company to help banks, which are laden with non performing assets—loans that have turned unproductive—to help them clean up their books and thereby facilitate the merger exercise.
Banks, meanwhile, have started identifying their non core assets, which can be monetized to improve their financial condition.
The gross NPAs of the state owned banks increased from 5.43% as on March 2015 to 7.30% as on December 2015. The government has decided to infuse Rs 70,000 crore by 2018, of which Rs 25,000 crore of recapitalization would be provided in the current financial year and the next. As per finance ministry calculations, a sum of about Rs 1,80,000 crore was required by the state owned banks in the next three years over as and above the average profits they make.
Wednesday, 9 March 2016
Provident Fund
09:37
Government rolls back proposal to Tax Provident Fund
Government rolls back proposal to Tax Provident Fund
New Delhi, Mar 8 (PTI) In the face of all round attack, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today completely rolled back the controversial proposal to tax the employees' provident fund (EPF) at the time of withdrawal.
Taking the first opportunity available, he made a suo motu statement in the Lok Sabha in which he also announced withdrawal of imposing monetary limit for contribution of employers to provident and superannuation fund of Rs 1.5 lakh for taking tax benefit.
Jaitley, however, left untouched the proposal tax exempt 40 per cent of National Pension Scheme and services provided by EPFO to employees.
"In view of the representations received, the government would like to do comprehensive review of this proposal and therefore I withdraw the proposals in para 138 and 139 on my budget speech. The proposal of 40 per cent exemption given to NPS subscribers at the time of withdrawal remains," the Minister said.
Source:PTINEWS
Wednesday, 2 March 2016
Group Medical Scheme
21:03
Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme (CGEGIS) -1980 – Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2016.
Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme (CGEGIS) -1980 – Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2016.
Source:http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/
Thursday, 18 February 2016
pensioners
07:32
CAT:Govt Agreed To Implement The Judgement Of The CAT Within One Month For Grant Of Full Pension To Pre 2006 Pensioners
Govt Agreed To Implement The Judgement Of The CAT Within One Month For Grant Of Full Pension To Pre 2006 Pensioners
Government Agrees To Implement The Judgement Of CAT
Govt agreed to implement the judgement of the CAT within one month for grant of full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners
Government has agreed to implement the judgement of the CAT within one month for grant of full Pension to Pre 2006 Pensioners who retired after 10 years of service on superannuation or 20 years of service on Voluntary retirement or absorption in PSU. This commitment was given by the Government Advocate in CAT PB New Delhi during the hearing of the Contempt of Court Case filed by Shri Pratap Narayan & others -vs - Union of India.
Older Post
CAT Reserves judgment in Full Pension on Superannuation after 10 years of service by Pre 2006 Pensioners
Details of arguments in CAT Delhi on 13-1-2016
Our Review Application to cover full pension after 10 years on superannuation or absorption in PSUs/Autonomous Bodies was taken up by the CAT Bench on
13th afternoon.
The GOI Advocate made the following points which were duly countered by our Advocate:
(i) Since the verdict dated 21-4-2015 was based on OA 1165/2011 as the lead case, which did not seek pro-rata pension after 10 years on superannuation or absorption in PSUs/Autonomous Bodies, this issue can not be raised now. Also, as per Apex court verdicts, if a verdict is silent on any particular prayer, it is assumed that the same is not accepted by the Court. He sought time to produce relevant rulings for which the Bench said that this should be done within 2 days beyond which they would not wait.
Our Advocate effectively countered this contention by pointing out that:
* Although OA 1165 initially did not cover this plea of full pension after 10 years on superannuation/absorption in PSUs, the other two OAs filed subsequently, specifically covered this aspect. And since all the 3 OAs were clubbed together in the verdict dated 21-4-2015 for a common verdict, this prayer can not be ignored;
* Notwithstanding this, it was brought to the notice of the Bench that as early as in 2013 (much before the verdict dated 21-4-2015) while filing our Rejoinder, it was specifically sought to amend our prayer in OA 1165/2011 to include this aspect also. Since GOI did not object to it at that time, the same is demed to have been amended and this issue can not be raised now.
* In any case, since all 3 OAs were clubbed together in a common verdict and this aspect was missed, it is well within the right of the Applicants to seek a Review of the order.
(ii) GOI Advocate mentioned that since this aspect was not raised in OA
655/2010 as mentioned in the verdict dated 1-11-2011, while seeking modified parity, this aspect can not be raised now.
Our Advocate countered this by pointing out that:
* While considering the Writ of S 30 Pensioners Association seeking full parity with post 1-1-2006 pensioners, Delhi High Court remanded the case back to CAT with the direction to ignore paras 1-11 of verdict dated 1-11-2011 in our case (which formed the basis of adverse verdict in S 30 case also) and consider the matter afresh. As a result, the Full Bench allowed their plea of full parity in pension between pre and post 2006 pensioners, subject to the condition that the pension of a pre 2006 retiree from the higher grade can not get a lower pension than the maximum pension of lower grade post 2005 retiree. He placed on record a copy of this verdict. Hence the reference of GOI to CAT verdict dated1-11-2011 was no longer relevant.
* The fact remains that the issue of denial of full pension after 20 years on VR and 10 years on superannuation/absorption in PSUs etc is covered by the same common instructions which have been quashed by Full Bench of the Tribunal and which decision has been upheld upto the highest level of Supreme Court while dismissing Curative Petition against CAT verdict dated 1-11-2011 in OA
655/2010. Consequently, discrimination between VR pensioners getting the benefit but not pensioners after superannuation/absorption on par with post
2005 retirees can not be justified.
(iii) GOI Advocate again mentioned that they are going to file a Writ against earlier verdict dated 21-4-2015, to which the Bench reiterated that unless a stay is granted it does not matter. (Incidentally, as indicated in my mail of 6-1-2016, we have already filed a Caveat in Delhi High Court on 8-1-2016 to forestall any ex-parte stay in the matter).
The Bench has since reserved the verdict which we hope to be out very soon. Regards,
Pratap Narayan
Source:Sapost
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
Provident Fund
09:11
PF interest rate hiked to 8.8% for 2015-16 from existing 8.75%
PF interest rate hiked to 8.8% for 2015-16 from existing 8.75%
The employees’ provident fund will earn a higher interest rate of 8.8% for 2015-16, marginally up from the existing 8.75%.
There has been demand to hike the PF interest rate to 8.90%.
Union Labour minister Bandaru Dattatreya said the hike is an ‘interim one’ and indicated that it could be further revised later.
There is global slowdown and interest rates in India are also coming down, the minister said, adding that the Reserve Bank of India and other central government organisations are monitoring the market trends.
“We had last time given 8.75% and this time, seeing the situation, we are declaring 8.8% for the workers,” he told reporters after chairing the 211th meeting of the Central Board of Trustees (CBT) of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).
While trade unions had demanded that the interest rate be fixed at 8.90%, the government had revised it to 8.80%, he said, underlining the Centre’s commitment to the working class.
“That is our motto. We don’t want to have a backward outlook. We want a forward outlook. We want to safeguard the workers’ interest. We want to give a real and purposeful picture before the workers and that is why a long debate took place today,” he said.
On trade unions’ demand for 8.9% interest rate, he said, if that was implemented, the ‘surplus’ the government will have would be Rs 285 crore. And in the case of 8.8%, the surplus will be Rs 673 crore, he explained.
Tuesday, 16 February 2016
pensioners
07:33
How Central Government Staff are able to secure more benefits, as compared to Bank Staff?
How Central Government Staff are able to secure more benefits, as compared to Bank Staff?
S No
|
Central
Government Staff
|
Bank
Staff
|
1
|
Government
Employees have a greater say in implementation of all policies and programmes
of the government. They manage the routine affairs of the
government. They only make the government visible to the common man.
They are the people who are running the government show for all practical
purposes.
Few
disgruntled elements among the government employees here and there are
sufficient to bring down the popularity of an elected government.
So, no
government will take the risk of displeasing them.
|
Bank staff, who are
considered as the central pillar of any country's economy, have been reduced
to voiceless creatures in our country. All social welfare schemes are dumped
on them, by various governments, without giving them any choice or a say.
They also have made
themselves cheap in the eyes of the society, by undertaking many jobs that
are remotely connected to banking. Their own managements also have to
take a major share of the blame for this situation, because they think that
in order to face stiff competition in the market and yet survive and
flourish, banks must volunteer to do many jobs, even if they are not
remunerative and result in wastage of precious human resources and loss of
money.
|
2
|
Government
is a virtual monopoly in many fields. Moreover, the government is in a
commanding position to determine the destiny of many sectors and their
survival.
|
Though banks are also
equally powerful and very important to the nation, because of intense,
unhealthy and unequal competition, the mid-sized and small banks find it
difficult to remain competitive and profit-making.
|
3
|
Central
government employees/pensioners (48 lakh persons in service and 55 lakh
pensioners) constitute a good size of the population.
|
In comparison, bank staff
in service (numbering about 10 lakhs) and another 2.50 lakh pensionersspread
over the entire country are
numerically very less.
|
4
|
If we include those
working in state governments and central/state PSUs and also the pensioners
who are anticipated to derive benefit out of CPC, they add up to another 2.50
crores.
|
Same as above.
|
S No
|
Central
Government Staff
|
Bank
Staff
|
5
|
If we
include their family members also, the total number of votes in their command
will cross 14 crores. This is a very huge vote bank that any party in
power cannot afford to displease.
|
Bank staff, pensioners
and their family members form a small vote bank, which is immaterial to the
party in power.
|
6
|
Pay
Revision is determined by a Pay Commission that is constituted by the Central
Government.
|
Pay revision is settled
through bipartite talks between IBA and the body of majority Trade Unions
(UFBU) at the national level.
|
7
|
The
Central Pay Commission is headed by a retired Supreme Court judge.
|
Union leaders are mostly
self-appointed - not democratically
elected - and
they claim to represent all sections of staff and pensioners. Moreover,
even those who retired from bank service long ago, are participating in the
wage revision talks, making mockery of the whole process.
|
8
|
Apart from the recognized Trade Unions and Associations, all
employees individually or as a group can submit their oral/written demands
and suggestions to the Commission directly. For this purpose, a
separate web site was developed by the 7th Pay Commission and unrestricted access to this site was provided
to everyone. This was one of the best steps taken by the Commission.
|
Individual members or a group of individuals arenot allowed to submit their demands, views and suggestions directly
to IBA. Even if they volunteer to do so, IBA never takes cognizance of
such inputs, howsoever relevant, useful, reasonable and logical they
are. Thus, the so called union leaders occupy the whole space by
themselves.
|
S No
|
Central
Government Staff
|
Bank
Staff
|
9
|
Besides,
the commission members visit many parts of the nation - north to south and
east to west - and personally hear the views of all the stakeholders.
At the time of such visits, the Commission also receives memoranda and
petitions submitted by the employees, pensioners and their
groups/associations. If necessary, the individuals and representatives of
such groups/associations are called to headquarters of the Commission for
deposing before the full Commission. Their deposition is properly documented
and preserved.
|
Neither the IBA officials
nor the chief negotiators from the unions/associations visit many parts of
the country so as to ascertain the views, aspirations and demands of
individual members. Yet, if any member or a group of members comes forward
to share their views with the union leaders and make suggestions, they are
discouraged and resisted. These central trade union leaders refuse to
meet those who want to meet them in person for this purpose. Worse
still, if any member sends an email to union's official email address in this
respect, the sender's email ID is blocked! IBA also does the same
thing.
|
10
|
The Pay
Commission recommends for merger of the entire Dearness Allowance outstanding
as on the day preceding the date of enforcement of new scales with Basic Pay.
|
During the recent
settlements, only that part of D.A. as existing 1 year before the effective
date of the wage revision is allowed to be merged with Basic Pay. This
results in lower Basic Pay, Allowances, Total Salary and superannuation
benefits like Gratuity, Leave Encashment, Commuted Pension, Monthly Pension
and Family Pension. It is a huge lifetime loss to all employees and
pensioners. In addition, it results in fixation of lower pay scales in every wage accord in future.
|
11
|
Pension
undergoes automatic upward revision with each wage revision.
|
Pension once fixed
remains the same. Even the revision made in D.A. with the changes in
Consumer Price Index gradually becomes a pittance, because the Basic Pension
does not get revised periodically.
|
12
|
Government
employees' salaries are charged to the Consolidated Fund of GOI, without any
reference to revenue receipts, revenue deficit and fiscal deficit.
|
Wage
revision of bank staff is always linked to net profit of member banks.
It is atrocious to note that Bad Debts written off during the past 10 years
is a mind boggling figure about which nobody is willing to talk.
Similarly, provisions kept for NPAs at the end of each year far exceed the
total establishment expenses for the whole year. This is a trend
observed during the past 6 years. As we all know, all the NPAs are not
irrecoverable. Therefore,
the amount of provisions made during the year for NPAs shall be added back to
the net profit, so as to arrive at the true 'cash profit' for the year.
Moreover, the government
must adequately compensate all the banks (in monetary terms) who faithfully
implement the social lending schemes and social welfare schemes of the
government.
|
Conclusion
As I am repeatedly writing,
banks must not take up un-remunerative jobs either voluntarily or due to
pressure and compulsion from the government or others. Method of
calculating the 'net profit' of banks must change so that camouflaging all evil
practices by the banks is stopped forthwith. Then only, the bad picture that is
sought to be created in common man's mind about the operational efficiency and
profitability of Indian Banks will change. The weak and corrupt trade union
leaders shall not be elected to the executive body of the trade unions and the
retired employees shall not be allowed to continue as members. While the
former is in the hands of the employees themselves, the latter can be achieved
only with the help of an amendment to the Trade Unions Act, 1926. Let us
hope that things will move in the right direction in the near future
Sunday, 14 February 2016
Saturday, 6 February 2016
government Employees
06:18
Government must take care of retirees' medical needs: Himachal HC
Government must take care of retirees' medical needs: Himachal HC
Shimla, Dec 31 : The central government must fulfill the medical requirements of government employees after retirement as the right to health was a human right, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled.
An employee cannot be left high and dry immediately after retirement for want of medical care. His medical issues are required to be looked into with more sensitivity, compassion and sympathy, observed a division bench comprising Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Sureshwar Thakur.
They said the genuine requirements of a former employee for medical treatment cannot be permitted to be buried in the labyrinth of red tapism.
Dismissing an appeal filed by the central government, challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal in favour of Shankar Lal Sharma, who underwent heart surgery after retirement and incurred an expenditure of Rs.1.8 lakh that the government declined to reimburse, the bench said the right to health was a human right.
"The action of the union of India not to reimburse the medical bills to the respondent and also not giving option to him and similarly situate people residing in a city not covered under the CGHS (Central Government Health Scheme) is illegal, arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory," said the 101-page order provided to the media on Wednesday.
Not providing post-retirement medical care to retired government officials in a city not covered by the CGHS at par with in-service employees would result in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, the judges said.
Moreover, they said, employees need medical care most after retirement.
The court said all central government pensioners residing in non-CGHS areas would be covered either under the Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules of 1944 or CGHS as per their option to be sought for by the government within six months.
Henceforth, option of the employees be sought by the central government at the time of their retirement whether they want to be covered under the Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules or under the CGHS.
In order to avoid litigation, the judgment was made applicable to all retired government officials residing in non-CGHS areas.
Tuesday, 2 February 2016
retirement
08:24
61% Indians aged 45-plus want to retire in next 5 years: Survey
61% Indians aged 45-plus want to retire in next 5 years: Survey
MUMBAI: Nearly 61 per cent working population in India aged 45 plus want to retire in the next five years, with the majority saying work-related pressure is affecting their mental and physical health.
Also, financial constraints are the biggest reason for those unable to retire, an HSBC survey revealed.
Global bank HSBC's latest edition of 'The Future of Retirement Healthy New Beginnings study' found that 61 per cent of the working population in India aged 45 plus want to retire in the next five years.
However, 14 per cent of them believe they will be unable to do so. Majority of them said they cannot retire as they would struggle financially.
The findings of the study bring out an urgent need for Indians to begin saving early and planning well for their retirement, the survey said.
The report also revealed that in India, 43 per cent would like to retire in the next five years to spend more time with their family. Others want to travel and pursue other interests (34 per cent) or pursue another career or voluntary work (20 per cent).
However, 59 per cent cited work related pressures and issues as the reason for wanting to retire.
The report also revealed that 27 per cent of pre-retirees aged 45 plus who would like to retire say it is because work is having a negative impact on their mental and physical health, 40 per cent of pre-retirees believe that poor health will make saving for their retirement more difficult.
"People worldwide are recognising that retirement can be an opportunity for reinvention and new beginnings.
Yet financial barriers are preventing many people from retiring when they would like to - or, in some cases, at all. Almost one in five people fear that they will never be able to retire fully, so the need for sound financial planning is stronger than ever," HSBC India Head of Retail Banking and Wealth Management S Ramakrishnan said.
On the global front, the survey of more than 18,000 people across 17 countries worldwide found that the desire to retire is the strongest in Argentina (78 per cent), France (77 per cent), China (75 per cent) and the UK (75 per cent).
Financial pressures are so great that 18 per cent of pre-retirees worldwide predict that they will never be able to retire fully. This is almost twice the proportion that said the same in 2015, when 10 per cent of pre-retirees expected never to be able to afford to fully retire, it said.
Source:sapost
Saturday, 30 January 2016
TAXES
08:02
How to get more Deduction in Tax for the Financial Year 2015-16
How to get more Deduction in Tax for the Financial Year 2015-16
You will be eligible to claim some more tax deductions for financial year 2015-16. Here is a quick update of the revised limit under various Income Tax sections that you must remember to claim this year.
1. Deduction limit on your medical insurance premium paid for self, children and spouse under Section 80D of Income Tax Act has been increased to Rs 25,000 per annum from earlier Rs 15,000 per annum. One can also claim a deduction of up to Rs 30,000 for medical insurance premium paid for parents against Rs 20,000 earlier. In case of senior citizen, the limit has been revised to Rs 30,000 per annum from earlier limit of Rs 20,000.
2. This year, you can claim an additional deduction of Rs 50,000 towards contribution made to New Pension Scheme (NPS) under Section 80CCD (1B) of Income Tax Act. This is apart from Rs 1.5 lakh deduction available under Section 80C. Now, the combined deduction under Section 80C and 80CCD (1B) is Rs 2 lakh.
3. You can also claim a deduction of Rs 75,000 per annum under Section 80DD on the medical expenses incurred on a dependent relative with disability (more than 40 per cent but less than 80 per cent) this year against Rs 50,000 per annum till last year. In case of severe disability (more than 80 per cent), you can claim Rs 1.25 lakh per annum instead of Rs 1 lakh per annum earlier, irrespective of the amount you incurred during the financial year. While claiming the deductions you will have to furnish a certificate from medical authorities.
4. Also, the deduction limit under Section 80DDB for expenditure incurred on specific diseases such as Dementia, malignanat cancers, AIDS and chronic renal failure has been increased to Rs 80,000 per annum from Rs 60,000 per annum in case of very senior citizen. You can claim up to Rs 80,000 or the amount actually spent whichever is lower.
5. In case of a person with disability, the deduction limit under Section 80U has been increased to Rs 75,000 for this year against the earlier limit of Rs 50,000. In case of severe disability the limit has been increased to Rs 1.25 lakh from earlier limit of Rs 1 lakh. This is applicable where the tax payer himself suffers from a disability.
6. You can claim a deduction of up to Rs 1,600 per month towards transport allowance provided by your employer to you. Till last year the limit was Rs 800 per month. Also, if the person is blind or orthopedically handicapped with disability of lower extremities, he or she can claim a deduction of up to Rs 3,200 per month against earlier limit of 16,00 per month.
Source:BankingNews
Source:BankingNews






